[ Is it right for you? ]
When staff augmentation is the right choice
Staff augmentation works best when you already know how you want testing done and just need the people. If the right column sounds more like you, another model will fit better.
A good fit if…
- You already have a QA lead and a testing process
- You need extra hands for a busy period or a growing backlog
- You’re missing a specific skill, such as automation, performance or security
- You want to keep full control of how testing is done
Consider another model if…
You have no QA lead to manage testers day to dayDedicated QA team → You want QA handled for you, measured against KPIsManaged testing → You have one launch, migration or audit with an end dateFixed-price project → You only need a few test cycles around releasesOn-demand testing → You’re not sure what’s wrong with your QA yetQA consulting →[ Who does what ]
You run the work. We handle the people.
The engineers are part of your team day to day, but stay employed by QAonTOP. This is exactly where responsibility sits.
You
- Manage the engineers’ daily work and priorities
- Set the process, tools and quality standards
- Review their work, as you would for your own team
- Decide when to add or release engineers
Together
- Agree the roles, skills and seniority you need
- Meet and approve each engineer before they start
- Keep the fit right as your needs change
QAonTOP
- Hire, vet and train the engineers
- Employ them, so you have no hiring or HR admin
- Handle replacements if an engineer isn’t the right fit
- Sign your NDA before any access
[ Seniority levels ]
Choose how independently each engineer works
Every role is available at four levels. Pick the level that matches how much guidance your QA lead can give.
-
Level 01
Junior
Runs planned test cases and reports bugs, with guidance from your lead.
-
Level 02
Mid-level
Works independently on features, writes test cases and tests end to end.
-
Level 03
Senior
Takes on complex or high-risk areas, designs tests and supports other testers.
-
Level 04
Lead
Plans and coordinates testing for a team or workstream.
[ How they work with you ]
Part of your team from the first standup
Augmented engineers don’t bring a separate process. They adapt to yours.
Your tools
They join your tracker, chat, repositories, test management tool and CI/CD.
Your process
They follow your sprint rhythm, test case formats and definition of done.
Your lead
They take work from your QA lead and report progress the way your team does.
Your hours
At least 4 hours overlap with US or European working hours for standups and triage.
You approve every engineer
You meet each engineer and decide before they join your team.
Monthly, per engineer
One clear line per engineer, billed monthly, with no minimum commitment.
Your assets stay yours
Test cases, reports and automation code belong to you.
NDA before access
We sign your NDA first and use test or masked data by default.
[ How it starts ]
From first message to an engineer in your standup
You approve every engineer, and can work with them for a free week before you commit.
-
Step 1 of 6
Tell us what you need
Share the roles, skills and seniority you’re missing. An engineer replies the same working day.
-
Step 2 of 6
Meet and approve
Meet the engineers we propose and approve the ones who fit your team.
-
Step 3 of 6
Free one-week pilot
Work with an engineer for one week on your product before you commit.
-
Step 4 of 6
Engineers join your team
They join your tools, standups and processes in 3–5 days.
-
Step 5 of 6
Your lead manages the work
Your QA lead sets daily priorities, just as for the rest of your team.
-
Step 6 of 6
Add or release as needed
Add engineers for busy periods or release them when demand drops. There’s no minimum commitment.
[ Compare models ]
Staff augmentation, dedicated team or managed testing?
All three are ongoing. The difference is who manages the testers and how much you commit to.
| Compare on | This pageStaff augmentation | CompareDedicated QA team | CompareManaged testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams with a QA lead who need extra hands or a missing skill | Products with continuous releases that need QA every sprint | Companies without in-house QA, or who want QA off their plate |
| Who manages the testers | You | QAonTOP | QAonTOP |
| Who sets testing priorities | You | You | QAonTOP, against goals agreed with you |
| Size | From 1 engineer | 2–10 people | Set by the agreed scope |
| Minimum commitment | None | 3 months, then monthly | 3 months, then monthly |
| Billing | Monthly per engineer | Monthly, quote-based | Fixed monthly fee for agreed scope |
Need the full picture? Compare all six engagement models or find your model in four questions.
[ FAQ ]
QA staff augmentation questions, answered
{{ f.a }}
[ Contact us ]
Hire QA engineers for your team
✓ Free one-week POC✓ NDA before access✓ A QA lead replies the same day
[ Keep exploring ]
Other engagement models
All engagement models →Dedicated QA team
2–10 engineers, managed by us
02Managed testing
We run QA end to end
03Fixed-price project
Agreed scope and end date
04QA consulting
Audit and 90-day plan
05On-demand testing
Pay per test cycle
Also useful: Hire QA engineers by role · Estimate your QA scope · Case studies