Market Research Platform QA Case Study: FlavorWiki Skip to main content
QAonTOP
Contact Us
Case studyMarket Research · B2B SaaS

FlavorWiki

Ten months of QA for a taste-testing platform where the data is the product

FlavorWiki collects sensory feedback from consumer tasters and turns it into AI-driven insight for food, beverage and consumer product brands. Two QAonTOP engineers tested its consumer portal, B2B platform and visualization system from 2022 to 2023.

FlavorWiki

Taste data you can trust, tested end to end.

In-home testing21 languagesReal-time data
✓Tasting invite
✓Buy product
✓Survey
✓Data check
✓Reimburse
Food & beverage insights · WorldwideQA by QAonTOP
10 months

Focused engagement, 2022 – 2023

1,200+

Test cases across consumer portal, B2B platform and dashboards

300+

Defects found and verified fixed

100%

Survey question types covered by data-capture checks

Client
FlavorWiki
Industry
Consumer insights · Food & beverage
Engagement
2022 – 2023 · 10 months
QA team
2 full-stack QA engineers
Platforms
Websites · Mobile Web · Consumer Portal · B2B Platform · Visualization System · API · Database
Services
  • Manual Testing
  • Visual Testing
  • Data Visualization Testing
  • UI/UX Testing
  • Cross-browser Testing
  • Usability Testing
  • SaaS Product Testing
Tools
  • Jira
  • Slack
  • GraphQL
  • Postman
  • Emulators
  • JMeter
  • BrowserStack
01Overview

About the project

FlavorWiki is a digital market research and consumer insights platform. Food, beverage and consumer product brands run taste tests with real consumers, who try products and answer structured sensory surveys on their own phone or laptop. FlavorWiki then uses artificial intelligence to turn that data into flavor profiles, preferences and market-by-market insight.

That makes the platform two products in one: a consumer portal simple enough for any taster, in any market, to complete a survey accurately, and a B2B platform where brand and research teams build studies and read results through charts, dashboards and exports. If a survey records the wrong answer or a chart misreads the data, a brand makes decisions on bad insight.

QAonTOP provided two full-stack QA engineers for a ten-month engagement from 2022 to 2023, working in Jira and Slack alongside FlavorWiki’s product and data teams.

02The challenge

What made this hard

In market research, a quiet data error is worse than a visible crash. FlavorWiki needed every answer captured correctly and every chart to tell the truth.

  1. CHALLENGE 01

    Surveys must record exactly what tasters mean

    Scales, rankings, branching logic and timed tasting steps. A mis-mapped answer or broken skip rule silently corrupts a whole study.

  2. CHALLENGE 02

    Charts are only as good as the numbers beneath

    Flavor profiles, preference maps and segment comparisons had to match the raw responses across filters, markets and exports.

  3. CHALLENGE 03

    Consumers on every kind of device

    Tasters join from older phones, tablets and laptops in many countries and languages. The portal had to behave the same on all of them.

  4. CHALLENGE 04

    Two audiences, one data model

    A change made for brand users in the B2B platform could break the consumer portal, and the reverse. Both had to be tested as one system.

03Our approach

How QAonTOP tested FlavorWiki

  1. 01

    Map each study end to end

    Traced a study from creation in the B2B platform to consumer invitation, survey completion and final report, and turned every step into test cases in Jira, with daily triage over Slack.

    Tools  Jira · Slack

  2. 02

    Validate survey logic and data capture

    Tested every question type, branching path and validation rule, then queried the GraphQL API through Postman to confirm each answer was stored exactly as given.

    Tools  GraphQL · Postman

  3. 03

    Visual and data-visualization testing

    Compared dashboards, charts and exports with expected values calculated from known test responses, and ran visual checks on layout, labels, legends and colour across screen sizes.

    Tools  GraphQL · BrowserStack

  4. 04

    Every browser, every device

    BrowserStack real devices and mobile emulators covered the consumer portal on the browsers and phones tasters actually use, including slow networks and translated interfaces.

    Tools  BrowserStack · Emulators

  5. 05

    Usability and load

    Usability walkthroughs of the taster journey to reduce drop-off, plus JMeter load tests for large panels submitting surveys at once and for heavy dashboard queries.

    Tools  JMeter

04Results

The engagement in numbers

10 months

Focused engagement, 2022 – 2023

2

Full-stack QA engineers

1,200+

Test cases across consumer portal, B2B platform and dashboards

300+

Defects found and verified fixed

100%

Survey question types covered by data-capture checks

25+

Browser, device and emulator combinations

05Impact of QAonTOP

Before and after the engagement

AreaBefore QAonTOPWith QAonTOP
Survey data captureAnswers checked on screen only, not in the stored data.Every question type verified end to end, from the taster’s tap to the stored record via GraphQL.
Dashboards & chartsCharts reviewed visually for obvious errors.Charts, filters and exports checked against expected values from known test data.
Branching logicSkip and display rules tested on a few common paths.Every branch and validation rule mapped and tested before a study goes live.
Device coverageConsumer portal tested on the team’s own devices.BrowserStack real devices and emulators across the browsers and phones tasters use.
PerformanceUnknown behaviour when large panels submitted at the same time.JMeter baselines for concurrent survey submission and dashboard queries.
Defect reportingBugs reported in scattered messages.Structured Jira defects with reproduction steps, triaged daily over Slack.
06Services delivered

What we covered

Manual Testing

Scripted and exploratory testing of study setup, invitations, surveys and reporting.

Visual Testing

Layout, label, legend and colour checks on dashboards and survey screens across screen sizes.

Data Visualization Testing

Charts, flavor profiles, filters and exports validated against expected values.

UI/UX Testing

Consumer portal and B2B platform screens checked against design and interaction patterns.

Cross-browser Testing

Consumer portal and dashboards on BrowserStack real devices and mobile emulators.

Usability Testing

Taster-journey walkthroughs to reduce confusion and survey drop-off.

SaaS Product Testing

Study configuration, user roles, accounts and API behaviour across the B2B platform.

Planning a similar project?

Get a ballpark QA cost in under two minutes.

Choose your platforms, team size and timeline in our cost estimator. No call needed.

See More Case Studies

Your dev team needs a solid QA partner

Free one-week POCNDA before accessA QA lead replies the same working day